Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs OUKITEL U23
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | OUKITEL U23 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 267699 | 83177 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G | MediaTek Helio P23 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 6.18 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2246х1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 3500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Plastic | Metal frame and glass case |
| Weight | 213 g | 201 g |
| Dimensions | 163,9 x 76,3 x 9,5 mm | 153.8 x 75.9 x 8.7 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy M51: Samsung Galaxy Note10+ - Compare Samsung Galaxy A51 5G 6/128Gb - Compare Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 8/128Gb - Compare |
169.60€ ($184.41) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs OUKITEL U23: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy M51’s camera vs OUKITEL U23’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | OUKITEL U23 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs OUKITEL U23: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy M51 vs OUKITEL U23, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | OUKITEL U23 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 3500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs OUKITEL U23: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M51 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 267699 score points which is 221.84% faster than the OUKITEL U23, which got 83177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs OUKITEL U23: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M51 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 382 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL U23 which got 168, it is 127.38% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1518 vs 961 (57.96% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy M51 and OUKITEL U23? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M51 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 221.84% faster in the Antutu test (184522 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 16Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 8Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2246х1080.
- More battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 3500mAh (a difference of 3500mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M51 (disadvantages)
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL U23 (advantages)
- Best weight: 12 grams less (201 vs 213).
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL U23 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy M51 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy M31S
OUKITEL U23 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite vs OUKITEL U23
- Compare OUKITEL U23 vs UMIDIGI A5 Pro
- Compare Huawei Honor 9 Lite vs OUKITEL U23
- Compare ZTE Nubia Z17 Lite vs OUKITEL U23
- Compare OUKITEL U23 vs GOME U7