0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Google Pixel 3a XL

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Google Pixel 3a XL Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Sharp Aquos R2 Compact with Google Pixel 3a XL.

Name Sharp Aquos R2 Compact Google Pixel 3a XL
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact Google Pixel 3a XL
Antutu benchmark 276448 175477
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
Diagonal size 5.2 " 6 "
Resolution 2280x1080 2160x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 10
RAM 4 Gb 4 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 64 GB 64 GB
External memory No No
Rear camera 22.6 Mp 12 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model Sony IMX363
dxomark mobile ranking 101
dxomark (photo) 104
dxomark (video) 95
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Battery 2500 mAh 3700 mAh
Wireless charging Yes No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 9.0 Android 11
Material Metal Plastic
Weight 139 g 167 g
Dimensions 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm 160.1 x 76,1 x 8,2 mm
  Price 343.36€ ($374.00) See Details 100.94€ ($109.95) See Details

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Google Pixel 3a XL: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs Google Pixel 3a XL’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 12Mp Sony IMX363 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Sharp Aquos R2 Compact Google Pixel 3a XL
Rear camera 22.6 Mp 12 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX363
Flash LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Flash No No

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Google Pixel 3a XL: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Google Pixel 3a XL, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Sharp Aquos R2 Compact Google Pixel 3a XL
Battery 2500 mAh 3700 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode 5-6 hours 7-8 hours
Talk time 25 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging Yes No

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Google Pixel 3a XL: Antutu benchmark comparison. Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Google Pixel 3a XL: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 57.54% faster than the Google Pixel 3a XL, which got 175477. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
5.2" (2280x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 845 / 4Gb / 64GB / 22.6Mp / 2500mAh
343.36€
$374.00
 
Google Pixel 3a XL
6 inches (2160x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 670 / 4Gb / 64GB / 12Mp Sony IMX363 / 3700mAh
100.94€
$109.95
 

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Google Pixel 3a XL: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the Google Pixel 3a XL which got 343, it is 46.06% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 1212 (63.86% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
5.2" (2280x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 845 / 4Gb / 64GB / 22.6Mp / 2500mAh
343.36€
$374.00
 
Google Pixel 3a XL
6 inches (2160x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 670 / 4Gb / 64GB / 12Mp Sony IMX363 / 3700mAh
100.94€
$109.95
 

What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and Google Pixel 3a XL? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 57.54% faster in the Antutu test (100971 score difference).
  • Best weight: 28 grams less (139 vs 167).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 12Mp Sony IMX363
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 2160x1080.
  • Have water resistant supports.
  • Have wireless charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Google Pixel 3a XL (advantages)

  • More battery capacity: 3700mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1200mAh).

Why it is better not to take Google Pixel 3a XL (disadvantages)

  • Does not have water resistant supports.
  • Does not have wireless charging support.

The advantages of both models

  • NFC supports.
  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons

Google Pixel 3a XL related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.39/5 of 36
Frequent comparisons