Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL Y4800
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL Y4800 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 149833 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek Helio P70 |
| Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 6.3 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal | Metal frame and plastic case |
| Weight | 139 g | 170 g |
| Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 157 x 74.8 x 8.25 mm |
| Price | 343.36€ ($374.00) See Details | 193.90€ ($211.20) See Details |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL Y4800: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs OUKITEL Y4800’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL Y4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL Y4800: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL Y4800, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL Y4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL Y4800: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 84.50% faster than the OUKITEL Y4800, which got 149833. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL Y4800: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL Y4800 which got 310, it is 61.61% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 1399 (41.96% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and OUKITEL Y4800? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 84.50% faster in the Antutu test (126615 score difference).
- Best weight: 31 grams less (139 vs 170).
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL Y4800 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX582 compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1500mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL Y4800 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
OUKITEL Y4800 related comparisons
- Compare Elephone Soldier vs OUKITEL Y4800
- Compare OUKITEL Y4800 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Global
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs OUKITEL Y4800
- Compare OUKITEL U23 vs OUKITEL Y4800
- Compare OUKITEL Y4800 vs Doogee N20