Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 511288 | 276448 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 990 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Diagonal size | 6.9 " | 5.2 " |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 2280x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | No |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung Bright S5KHM1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 222 g | 139 g |
| Dimensions | 166,9 x 76 x 8,8 mm | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm |
| Price | 642.87€ ($698.99) See Details | 343.37€ ($373.35) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung Bright S5KHM1 sensor and the 22.6Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung Bright S5KHM1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 511288 score points which is 84.95% faster than the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, which got 276448. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 490 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact which got 501, it is -2.20% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2757 vs 1986 (38.82% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra and Sharp Aquos R2 Compact? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 84.95% faster in the Antutu test (234840 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung Bright S5KHM1 compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 10Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3200x1440 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2500mAh).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Best weight: 83 grams less (139 vs 222).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Compare Nokia X5 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact