Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs UMIDIGI F1 Play
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | UMIDIGI F1 Play |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 143533 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek Helio P60 |
| Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 6.3 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 5150 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal | Plastic |
| Weight | 139 g | 183 g |
| Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 156.9 x 74.35 x 8.8 mm |
| Price | 343.36€ ($374.00) See Details | 184.88€ ($201.38) See Details |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs UMIDIGI F1 Play: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs UMIDIGI F1 Play’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 48Mp Samsung GM1 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | UMIDIGI F1 Play |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs UMIDIGI F1 Play: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs UMIDIGI F1 Play, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | UMIDIGI F1 Play |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 5150 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs UMIDIGI F1 Play: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 92.60% faster than the UMIDIGI F1 Play, which got 143533. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs UMIDIGI F1 Play: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the UMIDIGI F1 Play which got 293, it is 70.99% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 1439 (38.01% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and UMIDIGI F1 Play? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 92.60% faster in the Antutu test (132915 score difference).
- Best weight: 44 grams less (139 vs 183).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the UMIDIGI F1 Play (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM1 compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 5150mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2650mAh).
Why it is better not to take UMIDIGI F1 Play (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
UMIDIGI F1 Play related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs UMIDIGI F1 Play
- Compare UMIDIGI F1 vs UMIDIGI F1 Play
- Compare UMIDIGI One Pro vs UMIDIGI F1 Play
- Compare UMIDIGI F1 Play vs UMIDIGI A5 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Global vs UMIDIGI F1 Play