0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Sharp Aquos R2 Compact with Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb.

Name Sharp Aquos R2 Compact Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb
Antutu benchmark 276448 180575
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Diagonal size 5.2 " 6.53 "
Resolution 2280x1080 2340x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 10
RAM 4 Gb 4 Gb
Bezel-less Yes Yes
ROM 64 GB 64 GB
External memory No MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb
Rear camera 22.6 Mp 48 Mp
Camera Single camera
Sensor model Samsung GM1
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Battery 2500 mAh 6000 mAh
Wireless charging Yes No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 9.0 Android 10.0 (Q)
Material Metal Plastic
Weight 139 g 198 g
Dimensions 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm 162,3 x 77,3 x 9,6 mm
  Price 343.00€ ($371.31) See Details 169.00€ ($182.95) See Details

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs Xiaomi Poco M3’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 48Mp Samsung GM1 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Sharp Aquos R2 Compact Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb
Rear camera 22.6 Mp 48 Mp
Sensor model Samsung GM1
Flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Flash No No

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi Poco M3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Sharp Aquos R2 Compact Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb
Battery 2500 mAh 6000 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 8-9 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 5-6 hours 14-15 hours
Talk time 25 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging Yes No

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 53.09% faster than the Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb, which got 180575. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
5.2" (2280x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 845 / 4Gb / 64GB / 22.6Mp / 2500mAh
343.00€
$371.31
 
Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb
6.53 inches (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 662 / 4Gb / 64GB / 48Mp Samsung GM1 / 6000mAh
169.00€
$182.95
 

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb which got 321, it is 56.07% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 1332 (49.10% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
5.2" (2280x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 845 / 4Gb / 64GB / 22.6Mp / 2500mAh
343.00€
$371.31
 
Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb
6.53 inches (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 662 / 4Gb / 64GB / 48Mp Samsung GM1 / 6000mAh
169.00€
$182.95
 

What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 53.09% faster in the Antutu test (95873 score difference).
  • Best weight: 59 grams less (139 vs 198).
  • NFC supports.
  • Have water resistant supports.
  • Have wireless charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)

  • Does not have infrared blaster supports.

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb (advantages)

  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM1 compared to 22.6Mp
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 2280x1080.
  • More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 3500mAh).
  • Have infrared blaster supports.

Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.
  • Does not have water resistant supports.
  • Does not have wireless charging support.

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons

Xiaomi Poco M3 4/64Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.39/5 of 36
Frequent comparisons