Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 267699 | 148199 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G | MediaTek Helio P70 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 5.7 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2160x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Sony IMX230 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 213 g | 364 g |
| Dimensions | 163,9 x 76,3 x 9,5 mm | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy M51: Samsung Galaxy S23 FE - Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 4/64GB - Compare |
264.12€ ($287.69) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy M51’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 3WT’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Sony IMX230 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M51 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 267699 score points which is 80.63% faster than the Ulefone Armor 3WT, which got 148199. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M51 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 382 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 3WT which got 320, it is 19.38% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1518 vs 1475 (2.92% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy M51 and Ulefone Armor 3WT? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M51 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 80.63% faster in the Antutu test (119500 score difference).
- Best weight: 151 grams less (213 vs 364).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 21Mp Sony IMX230
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2160x1080.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M51 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3WT (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 7000mAh (a difference of 3300mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3WT (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy M51 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy M31S
Ulefone Armor 3WT related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor 3WT