Compare Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb vs Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb vs Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb with Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb.
Name	Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb	Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb

Antutu benchmark	33539	31000
CPU	MediaTek MT6735	MediaTek MT6737
Diagonal size	5.5 "	5.5 "
Resolution	1280x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	3 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	8 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model		Sony IMX219
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	4150 mAh	4200 mAh
Wireless charging
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	Yes	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 6.0	Android 6.0
Material	Plastic	Metal
Weight	185 g	155 g
Dimensions	152.3 x 77.2 x 8.8 mm	155.8 x 77.8 x 9.35 mm
Price	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb: Cubot Pocket - Compare Cubot King Kong Star - Compare Cubot King Kong Mini 2 - Compare	Discontinued. View all Ulefone models here Alternatives to the Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb: Ulefone Armor 5S - Compare Ulefone Note 8 - Compare Ulefone Note 7P - Compare

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb vs Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot Dinosaur’s camera vs Ulefone Tiger’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 8Mp Sony IMX219 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb	Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	8 Mp
Sensor model		Sony IMX219
Flash	LED flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb vs Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot Dinosaur vs Ulefone Tiger, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb	Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb
Battery	4150 mAh	4200 mAh
Type	Removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	7-8 hours	7-8 hours
Talk time	30 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb vs Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 33539 score points which is 8.19% faster than the Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb, which got 31000. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb

5.5" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6735 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4150mAh

89.52€

$96.91

33539

Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb

5.5" (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6737 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp Sony IMX219 / 4200mAh

0.00€

$0.00

31000

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb vs Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb

5.5" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6735 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4150mAh

89.52€

$96.91

0 / 0

Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb

5.5" (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6737 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp Sony IMX219 / 4200mAh

0.00€

$0.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb and Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb (advantages)

Good performance: Is 8.19% faster in the Antutu test (2539 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp Sony IMX219
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb (advantages)

Best weight: 30 grams less (155 vs 185).
More battery capacity: 4200mAh vs 4150mAh (a difference of 50mAh).

Why it is better not to take Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb (disadvantages)

Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb related comparisons

Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.64/5 of 444

Frequent comparisons