Compare Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 368775 | 38695 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 800 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.36 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2300x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 5280 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
| Weight | 284 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 164,5 x 81,4 x 15 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 314.53€ ($341.99) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5280 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 368775 score points which is 853.03% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 603 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 419.83% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2419 vs 603 (301.16% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 853.03% faster in the Antutu test (330080 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX582 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2300x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 5280mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 260mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 135 grams less (149 vs 284).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G vs Blackview BV9900 Pro
- Compare Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G vs Blackview BL5000
- Compare Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G vs Ulefone Armor 11
- Compare Blackview BL8000 vs Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G
- Compare Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G vs Ulefone Armor 10 5G
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus