Compare Blackview BV9500 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Blackview BV9500 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 65776 | 38695 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P23 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 5.7 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2160x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX298 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 8.0 (Oreo) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
| Weight | 293 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 165 x 81,8 x 18,7 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 132.98€ ($143.96) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Blackview BV9500 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview BV9500’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp Sony IMX298 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Blackview BV9500 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX298 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Blackview BV9500 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview BV9500 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Blackview BV9500 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Blackview BV9500 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV9500 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 65776 score points which is 69.99% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview BV9500 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV9500 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 172 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 48.28% faster. In "Multi-core" score 961 vs 603 (59.37% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview BV9500 and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BV9500 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 69.99% faster in the Antutu test (27081 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp Sony IMX298 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 10000mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 4980mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BV9500 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 144 grams less (149 vs 293).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Blackview BV9500 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV8000 Pro vs Blackview BV9500
- Compare Xiaomi Mi5S Plus vs Blackview BV9500
- Compare Doogee S60 vs Blackview BV9500
- Compare Blackview BV9500 vs Xiaomi MI6
- Compare Blackview BV9500 vs Blackview P10000 Pro
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus