Compare LG Velvet 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | LG Velvet 5G | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 316155 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.8 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM2 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4300 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 180 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 167.2 x 74.1 x 7.9 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 324.49€ ($352.82) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
LG Velvet 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the LG Velvet 5G’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Samsung GM2 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | LG Velvet 5G | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM2 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
LG Velvet 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the LG Velvet 5G vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | LG Velvet 5G | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4300 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
LG Velvet 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
LG Velvet 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 316155 score points which is 717.04% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
LG Velvet 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
LG Velvet 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 671 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 478.45% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1957 vs 603 (224.54% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between LG Velvet 5G and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the LG Velvet 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 717.04% faster in the Antutu test (277460 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM2 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1280x720.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take LG Velvet 5G (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 31 grams less (149 vs 180).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4300mAh (a difference of 720mAh).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
LG Velvet 5G related comparisons
- Compare LG Velvet 5G vs LG V60 ThinQ
- Compare LG Velvet 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs LG Velvet 5G
- Compare LG Velvet 5G vs LG V50 ThinQ 5G
- Compare LG Velvet 5G vs LG Wing
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus