Compare Oppo Find X2 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Oppo Find X2 Pro | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 507144 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.7 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 512 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX689 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4260 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | No | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 200 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 74.4 x 9.5 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Oppo models here
Alternatives to the Oppo Find X2 Pro: Oppo Reno 2 - Compare Oppo Find X3 8/128GB - Compare Oppo A9 2020 - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Oppo Find X2 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Oppo Find X2 Pro’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX689 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Oppo Find X2 Pro | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX689 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Oppo Find X2 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo Find X2 Pro vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Oppo Find X2 Pro | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4260 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Oppo Find X2 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Oppo Find X2 Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 507144 score points which is 1210.62% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Oppo Find X2 Pro vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Oppo Find X2 Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 923 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 695.69% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3435 vs 603 (469.65% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Oppo Find X2 Pro and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo Find X2 Pro (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1210.62% faster in the Antutu test (468449 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX689 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3168x1440 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Oppo Find X2 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 51 grams less (149 vs 200).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4260mAh (a difference of 760mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Oppo Find X2 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Oppo Find X2 Pro vs OnePlus 8
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro Exclusive vs Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Compare Oppo Find X2 vs Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Compare Oppo Find X2 Pro vs Vivo NEX 3S
- Compare Oppo Find X2 Pro vs Oppo Find X3 Pro
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus