Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 129663 | 38695 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 850 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.4 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 3 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM2 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Metal |
| Weight | 221 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75,9 x 9,7 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 107.95€ ($117.37) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy M12’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Samsung GM2 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM2 | |
| Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 129663 score points which is 235.09% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 162 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 39.66% faster. In "Multi-core" score 933 vs 603 (54.73% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 235.09% faster in the Antutu test (90968 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM2 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 72 grams less (149 vs 221).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 20mAh).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Samsung Galaxy A12 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A22 4G vs Samsung Galaxy M12
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Samsung Galaxy A03s
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Samsung Galaxy A02s
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M21 vs Samsung Galaxy M12
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus