Compare Ulefone Armor 9E vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 223811 | 38695 |
CPU | MediaTek Helio P90 | MediaTek MT6753 |
Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
Battery | 6600 mAh | 5020 mAh |
Wireless charging | Yes | |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
Weight | 320 g | 149 g |
Dimensions | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
Price | 338.52€ ($366.46) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 9E’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 9E vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Battery | 6600 mAh | 5020 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | Yes |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9E in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 223811 score points which is 478.40% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9E in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 417 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 259.48% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1531 vs 603 (153.90% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 9E and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 9E (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 478.40% faster in the Antutu test (185116 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 1580mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 9E (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 171 grams less (149 vs 320).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Ulefone Armor 9E related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Blackview BV9800 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 9 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6S vs Ulefone Armor 9E
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus