Compare ZTE Blade X1 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | ZTE Blade X1 5G | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 321778 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 3 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Metal |
| Weight | 190 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 164 x 76 x 9.2 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all ZTE models here
Alternatives to the ZTE Blade X1 5G: ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro 16/512GB Global Version - Compare ZTE Nubia Red Magic 7s Pro 12/256GB Global Version - Compare ZTE Nubia Red Magic 7 Pro Transformers Edition 12/256GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
ZTE Blade X1 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the ZTE Blade X1 5G’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Samsung GM1 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | ZTE Blade X1 5G | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| Flash | LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
ZTE Blade X1 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the ZTE Blade X1 5G vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | ZTE Blade X1 5G | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
ZTE Blade X1 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
ZTE Blade X1 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 321778 score points which is 731.58% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
ZTE Blade X1 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
ZTE Blade X1 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 607 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 423.28% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1894 vs 603 (214.10% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between ZTE Blade X1 5G and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the ZTE Blade X1 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 731.58% faster in the Antutu test (283083 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM1 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take ZTE Blade X1 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 41 grams less (149 vs 190).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1020mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
ZTE Blade X1 5G related comparisons
- Compare ZTE Red Magic 5s vs ZTE Blade X1 5G
- Compare ZTE Blade X1 5G vs ZTE Nubia Red Magic
- Compare ZTE Blade X1 5G vs ZTE Nubia X
- Compare ZTE Blade X1 5G vs ZTE Blade V10
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 8A vs ZTE Blade X1 5G
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus