Compare ZTE Red Magic 5G 16/256Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | ZTE Red Magic 5G 16/256Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 625211 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.65 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 16 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal | Metal |
| Weight | 218 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 168.6 x 78 x 9.8 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all ZTE models here
Alternatives to the ZTE Red Magic 5G 16/256Gb: ZTE Nubia Z50 - Compare ZTE Axon 40 Pro 8/128GB - Compare ZTE Nubia Red Magic 6/64Gb - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
ZTE Red Magic 5G 16/256Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the ZTE Red Magic 5G’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | ZTE Red Magic 5G 16/256Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
ZTE Red Magic 5G 16/256Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the ZTE Red Magic 5G vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | ZTE Red Magic 5G 16/256Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
ZTE Red Magic 5G 16/256Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
ZTE Red Magic 5G 16/256Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 625211 score points which is 1515.74% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
ZTE Red Magic 5G 16/256Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
ZTE Red Magic 5G 16/256Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 923 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 695.69% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3435 vs 603 (469.65% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between ZTE Red Magic 5G 16/256Gb and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the ZTE Red Magic 5G 16/256Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1515.74% faster in the Antutu test (586516 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take ZTE Red Magic 5G 16/256Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 69 grams less (149 vs 218).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4500mAh (a difference of 520mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
ZTE Red Magic 5G 16/256Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Global vs ZTE Red Magic 5G
- Compare ZTE Red Magic 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro Zoom Edition
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 10 vs ZTE Red Magic 5G
- Compare ZTE Nubia Red Magic vs ZTE Red Magic 5G
- Compare ZTE Nubia X vs ZTE Red Magic 5G
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus