0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare ZUK Z1 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb

ZUK Z1 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of ZUK Z1 with Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb.

Name ZUK Z1 Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
ZUK Z1 Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Antutu benchmark 48262 38695
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size 5.5 " 5 "
Resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 3 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 64 GB 16 GB
External memory No MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 8 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model Sony IMX214
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 2 Mp
Battery 4100 mAh 5020 mAh
Wireless charging
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 5.1 Android 7.0
Material Metal frame and plastic case Metal
Weight 175 g 149 g
Dimensions 155,7 x 77,3 x 8.9 mm 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm
  Price Discontinued. View all ZUK models here
Alternatives to the ZUK Z1:
Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb:

ZUK Z1 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the ZUK Z1’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp Sony IMX214 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name ZUK Z1 Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 8 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX214
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 2 Mp
Flash No No

ZUK Z1 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the ZUK Z1 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name ZUK Z1 Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Battery 4100 mAh 5020 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 6-7 hours 10-12 hours
Talk time 25 hours 30 hours
Fast charging No Yes
Wireless charging

ZUK Z1 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. ZUK Z1 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

ZUK Z1 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 48262 score points which is 24.72% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

ZUK Z1
5.5" (1920x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 801 / 3Gb / 64GB / 13Mp Sony IMX214 / 4100mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

ZUK Z1 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

ZUK Z1 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 603 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

ZUK Z1
5.5" (1920x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 801 / 3Gb / 64GB / 13Mp Sony IMX214 / 4100mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between ZUK Z1 and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the ZUK Z1 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 24.72% faster in the Antutu test (9567 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp Sony IMX214 compared to 8Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1280x720.

Why it is better not to take ZUK Z1 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have fast charging support

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Best weight: 26 grams less (149 vs 175).
  • More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4100mAh (a difference of 920mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

ZUK Z1 related comparisons

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.63/5 of 352
Frequent comparisons