Compare Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Cubot J5

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Cubot J5 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Vernee Thor 3/16Gb with Cubot J5.
Name	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb	Cubot J5

Antutu benchmark	37524	21244
CPU	MediaTek MT6753	MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size	5 "	5.5 "
Resolution	1280x720	960x480
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	2
RAM	3 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	8 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	2800 mAh	2800 mAh
Wireless charging		No
Network	4 G	3 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	Yes	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 6.0	Android 9.0
Material	Metal and plastic	Plastic
Weight	140 g	157 g
Dimensions	142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm	150.3 x 72 x 9.2 mm
Price	Discontinued. View all Vernee models here Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:	64.33€ ($69.64) See Details

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Cubot J5: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor’s camera vs Cubot J5’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb	Cubot J5
Rear camera	13 Mp	8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Cubot J5: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor vs Cubot J5, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb	Cubot J5
Battery	2800 mAh	2800 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	5-6 hours	7-8 hours
Talk time	20 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging		No

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Cubot J5: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 37524 score points which is 76.63% faster than the Cubot J5, which got 21244. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh

0.00€

$0.00

37524

Cubot J5

5.5 inches (960x480) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 2800mAh

64.33€

$69.64

21244

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Cubot J5: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot J5 which got 65, it is 78.46% faster. In "Multi-core" score 604 vs 222 (172.07% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh

0.00€

$0.00

116 / 604

Cubot J5

5.5 inches (960x480) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 2800mAh

64.33€

$69.64

65 / 222

What is the difference between Vernee Thor 3/16Gb and Cubot J5? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

Good performance: Is 76.63% faster in the Antutu test (16280 score difference).
Best weight: 17 grams less (140 vs 157).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 960x480.
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot J5 (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Cubot J5 (disadvantages)

Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

Cubot J5 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.61/5 of 425

Frequent comparisons