0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR درهم SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Motorola One Vision Plus vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

Motorola One Vision Plus vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Motorola One Vision Plus with Vernee Thor 3/16Gb.

Name Motorola One Vision Plus Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Motorola One Vision Plus Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Antutu benchmark 160476 37524
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size 6.3 " 5 "
Resolution 2280x1080 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 4 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 128 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 48 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Triple Camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 21 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 4000 mAh 2800 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 9.0 Android 6.0
Material Plastic Metal and plastic
Weight 188 g 140 g
Dimensions 158,4 x 75,8 x 8,7 mm 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm
  Price 194.97€ ($211.99) See Details Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:

Motorola One Vision Plus vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Motorola One Vision Plus’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Motorola One Vision Plus Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Rear camera 48 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 21 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Motorola One Vision Plus vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Motorola One Vision Plus vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Motorola One Vision Plus Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Battery 4000 mAh 2800 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 7-8 hours 5-6 hours
Talk time 30 hours 20 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No

Motorola One Vision Plus vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. Motorola One Vision Plus vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Motorola One Vision Plus in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 160476 score points which is 327.66% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Motorola One Vision Plus
6.3 inches (2280x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 665 / 4Gb / 128GB / 48Mp / 4000mAh
194.97€
$211.99
 
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Motorola One Vision Plus vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Motorola One Vision Plus in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 316 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 172.41% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1377 vs 604 (127.98% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Motorola One Vision Plus
6.3 inches (2280x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 665 / 4Gb / 128GB / 48Mp / 4000mAh
194.97€
$211.99
 
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Motorola One Vision Plus and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Motorola One Vision Plus (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 327.66% faster in the Antutu test (122952 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp compared to 13Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 21Mp vs 5Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 1280x720.
  • More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 1200mAh).

Why it is better not to take Motorola One Vision Plus (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Best weight: 48 grams less (140 vs 188).

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Motorola One Vision Plus related comparisons

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.67/5 of 3
Frequent comparisons