Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs IIIF150 B2021
| Name | Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb | IIIF150 B2021 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 263117 | 102775 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G | MediaTek Helio G25 |
| Diagonal size | 6.47 " | 5.86 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Five cameras | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5260 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 208 g | 315 g |
| Dimensions | 157.8 x 74.2 x 9.7 mm | 158 x 78 x 18 mm |
| Price | 395.56€ ($430.09) See Details | 126.69€ ($137.75) See Details |
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs IIIF150 B2021: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi CC9 Pro’s camera vs IIIF150 B2021’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb | IIIF150 B2021 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs IIIF150 B2021: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs IIIF150 B2021, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb | IIIF150 B2021 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5260 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs IIIF150 B2021: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 263117 score points which is 156.01% faster than the IIIF150 B2021, which got 102775. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs IIIF150 B2021: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 549 points score in "Single-core" of against the IIIF150 B2021 which got 172, it is 219.19% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1771 vs 967 (83.14% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb and IIIF150 B2021? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 156.01% faster in the Antutu test (160342 score difference).
- Best weight: 107 grams less (208 vs 315).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1520x720.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 B2021 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 8000mAh vs 5260mAh (a difference of 2740mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 B2021 (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 9 vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Huawei Honor 10X
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Max vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro
IIIF150 B2021 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL WP5 Pro vs F150 B2021
- Compare UMIDIGI Bison vs F150 B2021
- Compare F150 B2021 vs OUKITEL WP8 Pro
- Compare Doogee S59 Pro vs F150 B2021
- Compare OUKITEL WP5 vs F150 B2021