Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs AGM A9 4/64Gb
| Name | Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb | AGM A9 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 287111 | 65331 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 |
| Diagonal size | 6.18 " | 5.99 " |
| Resolution | 2246х1080 | 2160x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX363 | Sony IMX486 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | 91 | |
| dxomark (photo) | 92 | |
| dxomark (video) | 90 | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 8.1 | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 182 g | 251 g |
| Dimensions | 155,5 x 75,2 x 8,8 mm | 168 x 81,4 x 12,6 mm |
| Price | 277.16€ ($299.54) See Details | 104.26€ ($112.68) See Details |
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1’s camera vs AGM A9’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Sony IMX363 sensor and the 12Mp Sony IMX486 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb | AGM A9 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX363 | Sony IMX486 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs AGM A9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb | AGM A9 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 287111 score points which is 339.47% faster than the AGM A9 4/64Gb, which got 65331. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 520 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM A9 4/64Gb which got 146, it is 256.16% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2282 vs 146 (1463.01% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb and AGM A9 4/64Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 339.47% faster in the Antutu test (221780 score difference).
- Best weight: 69 grams less (182 vs 251).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 16Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2246х1080 vs 2160x1080.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM A9 4/64Gb (advantages)
- NFC supports.
- More battery capacity: 5400mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1400mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM A9 4/64Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Apple iPhone 7 Ref vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs UMIDIGI F1
- Compare Elephone S8 vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs Apple iPhone 6s Ref
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 8 vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1
AGM A9 4/64Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi MI6 Ceramic vs AGM A9
- Compare AGM X2 SE vs AGM A9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 3 vs AGM A9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6 vs AGM A9
- Compare AGM X3 vs AGM A9