Compare Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Xiaomi Redmi 8A
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Xiaomi Redmi 8A |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 148199 | 88112 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P70 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 |
| Diagonal size | 5.7 " | 6.22 " |
| Resolution | 2160x1080 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 21 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | Sony IMX486 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 10300 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 364 g | 190 g |
| Dimensions | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm | 156.3×75.4×9.4 mm |
| Price | 264.59€ ($287.69) See Details | 91.70€ ($99.71) See Details |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Xiaomi Redmi 8A: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 3WT’s camera vs Xiaomi Redmi 8A’s camera, see the difference between the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor and the 12Mp Sony IMX486 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Xiaomi Redmi 8A |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 21 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | Sony IMX486 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Xiaomi Redmi 8A: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Xiaomi Redmi 8A, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Xiaomi Redmi 8A |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 10300 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Xiaomi Redmi 8A: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3WT in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 148199 score points which is 68.19% faster than the Xiaomi Redmi 8A, which got 88112. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Xiaomi Redmi 8A: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3WT in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 320 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Redmi 8A which got 147, it is 117.69% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1475 vs 520 (183.65% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 3WT and Xiaomi Redmi 8A? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3WT (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 68.19% faster in the Antutu test (60087 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 21Mp Sony IMX230 compared to 12Mp Sony IMX486
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 5300mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3WT (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi 8A (advantages)
- Best weight: 174 grams less (190 vs 364).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi 8A (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Ulefone Armor 3WT related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
Xiaomi Redmi 8A related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs Xiaomi Redmi 8A
- Compare UMIDIGI A5 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 8A
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Xiaomi Redmi 8A
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 8A vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Global
- Compare GOME U7 vs Xiaomi Redmi 8A