Compare Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot GT95

Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot GT95 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot Pocket 3 with Cubot GT95.
Name	Cubot Pocket 3	Cubot GT95

Antutu benchmark	209744
CPU	MediaTek Helio G85	MediaTek MT6572W
Diagonal size	4.5 "	4 "
Resolution	1170x480	800x480
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	4 Gb	0.5 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	64 GB	4 GB
External memory	No
Rear camera	20 Mp	5 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	0.3 Mp
Battery	3000 mAh	1350 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	G
Sim cards
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No
Fingerprint's scanner	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 12
Material	Plastics and rubber
Weight	g	g
Dimensions	mm	mm
Price	181.07€ ($196.79) See Details	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot GT95: Cubot KingKong Power - Compare Cubot King Kong - Compare Cubot Max 3 - Compare

Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot GT95: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot Pocket 3’s camera vs Cubot GT95’s camera, see the difference between the 20Mp sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot Pocket 3	Cubot GT95
Rear camera	20 Mp	5 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	0.3 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot GT95: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot GT95, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot Pocket 3	Cubot GT95
Battery	3000 mAh	1350 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	4-5 days
Battery Life	1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode	6-7 hours
Talk time	25 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging	No

Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot GT95: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket 3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 209744 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot GT95, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot Pocket 3

4.5 inches (1170x480) Glass / Helio G85 / 4Gb / 64GB / 20Mp / 3000mAh

181.07€

$196.79

209744

Cubot GT95

4" (800x480) / MT6572W / 0.5Gb / 4GB / 5Mp / 1350mAh

55.22€

$60.01

Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot GT95: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket 3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 386 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot GT95 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1371 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot Pocket 3

4.5 inches (1170x480) Glass / Helio G85 / 4Gb / 64GB / 20Mp / 3000mAh

181.07€

$196.79

386 / 1371

Cubot GT95

4" (800x480) / MT6572W / 0.5Gb / 4GB / 5Mp / 1350mAh

55.22€

$60.01

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot Pocket 3 and Cubot GT95? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Pocket 3 (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 20Mp compared to 5Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 0.3Mp .
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 1170x480 vs 800x480.
More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 1350mAh (a difference of 1650mAh).
Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot Pocket 3 (disadvantages)

Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot GT95 (advantages)

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot GT95 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.
Does not have water resistant supports.

The advantages of both models

Cubot Pocket 3 related comparisons

Cubot GT95 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons