Compare Cubot X9 vs Cubot S222
Name | Cubot X9 | Cubot S222 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 29637 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6592M | |
Diagonal size | 5 " | " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 2 Gb | Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb | |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | Sony IMX135 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
Battery | 2200 mAh | 2350 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 3 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | |
Notifications Led | Yes | |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 4.4 | |
Material | Metal frame and plastic case | |
Weight | 124 g | g |
Dimensions | 143.5 x 72.5 x 7.3 mm | mm |
Price | 63.49€ ($69.00) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot S222: Cubot Pocket - Compare Cubot King Kong Mini 2 - Compare Cubot Max 3 - Compare |
Cubot X9 vs Cubot S222: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot X9’s camera vs Cubot S222’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp Sony IMX135 sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Cubot X9 | Cubot S222 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | Mp |
Sensor model | Sony IMX135 | |
Flash | LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
Flash | No |
Cubot X9 vs Cubot S222: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot X9 vs Cubot S222, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Cubot X9 | Cubot S222 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2200 mAh | 2350 mAh |
Type | Removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 4-5 days | |
Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 4-5 hours | |
Talk time | 20 hours | |
Fast charging | No | |
Wireless charging |
Cubot X9 vs Cubot S222: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot X9 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 29637 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S222, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot X9 vs Cubot S222: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot X9 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S222 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot X9 and Cubot S222? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X9 (advantages)
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot X9 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S222 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 2350mAh vs 2200mAh (a difference of 150mAh).
Why it is better not to take Cubot S222 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Cubot X9 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Lenovo K5 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Cubot Quest
- Compare Xiaomi Mi5S Plus vs Xiaomi Mi 8 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite vs Lenovo K5 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs Lenovo K5 Pro
Cubot S222 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro vs LeEco Le Max 2
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro vs Ulefone Power 2
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X vs LeEco Le Max 2
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs LeEco Le Max 2
- Compare Ulefone Power 2 vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus