0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT

IIIF150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of IIIF150 R2022 with UMIDIGI Bison GT.

Name IIIF150 R2022 UMIDIGI Bison GT
IIIF150 R2022 UMIDIGI Bison GT
Antutu benchmark 313177 312667
CPU MediaTek Helio G95 MediaTek Helio G95
Diagonal size 6.78 " 6.67 "
Resolution 2460x1080 2400x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 10
RAM 8 Gb 8 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 128 GB 128 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera 64 Mp 64 Mp
Camera Four cameras Four cameras
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 32 Mp
Battery 8300 mAh 5150 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 11 Android 10.0 (Q)
Material Plastics and rubber Plastics and rubber
Weight 350 g 283 g
Dimensions 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm 170.3 x 82.5 x 12.8 mm
  Price 187.15€ ($203.20) See Details Discontinued. View all UMIDIGI models here
Alternatives to the UMIDIGI Bison GT:
UMIDIGI Bison X10G - Compare
UMIDIGI F2 - Compare
UMIDIGI F3 5G - Compare

IIIF150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 R2022’s camera vs UMIDIGI Bison GT’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 64Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name IIIF150 R2022 UMIDIGI Bison GT
Rear camera 64 Mp 64 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Four LEDs Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 32 Mp
Flash No No

IIIF150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name IIIF150 R2022 UMIDIGI Bison GT
Battery 8300 mAh 5150 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 14-15 hours 10-12 hours
Talk time 30 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No No

IIIF150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT: Antutu benchmark comparison. IIIF150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT: Antutu benchmark comparison.

IIIF150 R2022 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 313177 score points which is 0.16% faster than the UMIDIGI Bison GT, which got 312667. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

IIIF150 R2022
6.78 inches (2460x1080) Curved Glass / Helio G95 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp / 8300mAh
187.15€
$203.20
 
UMIDIGI Bison GT
6.67 inches (2400x1080) Curved Glass / Helio G95 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp / 5150mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

IIIF150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

IIIF150 R2022 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 427 points score in "Single-core" of against the UMIDIGI Bison GT which got 425, it is 0.47% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1550 vs 1552 (-0.13% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

IIIF150 R2022
6.78 inches (2460x1080) Curved Glass / Helio G95 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp / 8300mAh
187.15€
$203.20
 
UMIDIGI Bison GT
6.67 inches (2400x1080) Curved Glass / Helio G95 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp / 5150mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between IIIF150 R2022 and UMIDIGI Bison GT? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 0.16% faster in the Antutu test (510 score difference).
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 2400x1080.
  • More battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 5150mAh (a difference of 3150mAh).

Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the UMIDIGI Bison GT (advantages)

  • Best weight: 67 grams less (283 vs 350).
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 16Mp .

Why it is better not to take UMIDIGI Bison GT (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • NFC supports.
  • Have water resistant supports.
  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons

UMIDIGI Bison GT related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 120
Frequent comparisons