0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR درهم SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Runbo F1

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Runbo F1 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb with Runbo F1.

Name Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Runbo F1
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Runbo F1
Antutu benchmark 38695 27000
CPU MediaTek MT6753 MediaTek MT6735
Diagonal size 5 " 5.5 "
Resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5 5
RAM 3 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 16 GB 32 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera 8 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 2 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 5020 mAh 5000 mAh
Wireless charging
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes No
Operating system (OS) Android 7.0 Android 4.4
Material Metal Plastics and rubber
Weight 149 g 290 g
Dimensions 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm 166 x 88 x 15 mm
  Price Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb:
Discontinued. View all Runbo models here
Alternatives to the Runbo F1:

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Runbo F1: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor E’s camera vs Runbo F1’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Runbo F1
Rear camera 8 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 2 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Runbo F1: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor E vs Runbo F1, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Runbo F1
Battery 5020 mAh 5000 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours 10-12 hours
Talk time 30 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Runbo F1: Antutu benchmark comparison. Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Runbo F1: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 38695 score points which is 43.31% faster than the Runbo F1, which got 27000. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Runbo F1
5.5" (1920x1080) Glass / MT6735 / 3Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 5000mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Runbo F1: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the Runbo F1 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 603 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Runbo F1
5.5" (1920x1080) Glass / MT6735 / 3Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 5000mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb and Runbo F1? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 43.31% faster in the Antutu test (11695 score difference).
  • Best weight: 141 grams less (149 vs 290).
  • More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 20mAh).

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Runbo F1 (advantages)

  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 2Mp .
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1280x720.

Why it is better not to take Runbo F1 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons

Runbo F1 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.63/5 of 296
Frequent comparisons