Compare GOME U7 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | GOME U7 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 83545 | 38695 |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6757 Pro / Helio P25 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 5.99 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2160x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX258 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 3050 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 7.1 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal and plastic | Metal |
| Weight | 164 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 75.2 x 7.5 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all GOME models here
Alternatives to the GOME U7: |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
GOME U7 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the GOME U7’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp Sony IMX258 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | GOME U7 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX258 | |
| Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
GOME U7 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the GOME U7 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | GOME U7 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 3050 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
GOME U7 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
GOME U7 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 83545 score points which is 115.91% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
GOME U7 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
GOME U7 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 178 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 53.45% faster. In "Multi-core" score 922 vs 603 (52.90% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between GOME U7 and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the GOME U7 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 115.91% faster in the Antutu test (44850 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp Sony IMX258 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take GOME U7 (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 15 grams less (149 vs 164).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 3050mAh (a difference of 1970mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
GOME U7 related comparisons
- Compare UMIDIGI F1 vs GOME U7
- Compare UMIDIGI One Pro vs GOME U7
- Compare GOME U7 vs UMIDIGI A5 Pro
- Compare BLUBOO S1 vs GOME U7
- Compare Xiaomi Mi A2 vs GOME U7
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus