Compare Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot GT90
Name | Cubot King Kong Star | Cubot GT90 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 365772 | |
CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 700 | |
Diagonal size | 6.78 " | " |
Resolution | 2460x1080 | |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | |
RAM | 12 Gb | Gb |
Bezel-less | No | |
ROM | 256 GB | GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | |
Rear camera | 100 Mp | Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | Mp |
Battery | 10600 mAh | mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 5 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | Yes | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
Notifications Led | Yes | |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | |
Material | Plastics and rubber | |
Weight | 395 g | g |
Dimensions | 180.2 x 80.8 x 17.8 mm | mm |
Price | 207.71€ ($225.84) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot GT90: Cubot KingKong Power - Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro - Compare Cubot S200 - Compare |
Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot GT90: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong Star’s camera vs Cubot GT90’s camera, see the difference between the 100Mp sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Cubot King Kong Star | Cubot GT90 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 100 Mp | Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | Mp |
Flash | No |
Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot GT90: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot GT90, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Cubot King Kong Star | Cubot GT90 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 10600 mAh | mAh |
Type | Non-removable | |
Stand-by time | 8-9 days | |
Battery Life | 5-6 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | |
Talk time | 30 hours | |
Fast charging | Yes | |
Wireless charging | No |
Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot GT90: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong Star in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 365772 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot GT90, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot GT90: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong Star in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 633 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot GT90 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1947 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot King Kong Star and Cubot GT90? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong Star (advantages)
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong Star (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot GT90 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Cubot GT90 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Cubot King Kong Star related comparisons
- Compare Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot King Kong 9
- Compare Doogee S110 vs Cubot King Kong Star
- Compare Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot KingKong Power
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Cubot King Kong Star
- Compare Doogee V30T 5G vs Cubot King Kong Star
Cubot GT90 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV8000 Pro vs Doogee Mix
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi5
- Compare Blackview BV8000 Pro vs Blackview BV9000 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Xiaomi Mi5
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Doogee BL5000