Compare Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Nokia C3
Name | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB | Nokia C3 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 78446 | 28177 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 | UNISOC SC9832E |
Diagonal size | 6.26 " | 5.99 " |
Resolution | 1520x720 | 1520x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 2 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 4000 mAh | 3030 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |
Weight | 181 g | 185 g |
Dimensions | 159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm | 159.9 x 77 x 8.7 mm |
Price | 129.18€ ($140.71) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Nokia models here
Alternatives to the Nokia C3: Nokia 2.1 - Compare Nokia 2.2 - Compare Nokia 5.4 4/64GB - Compare |
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Nokia C3: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Nokia 3.2’s camera vs Nokia C3’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB | Nokia C3 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Nokia C3: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB | Nokia C3 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4000 mAh | 3030 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 1,5-2 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 6-7 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | No | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Nokia C3: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 78446 score points which is 178.40% faster than the Nokia C3, which got 28177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Nokia C3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 167 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia C3 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 546 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Nokia 3.2 2/16GB and Nokia C3? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 178.40% faster in the Antutu test (50269 score difference).
- Best weight: 4 grams less (181 vs 185).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 3030mAh (a difference of 970mAh).
Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia C3 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Nokia C3 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 7 Plus vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia G21 vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C1
- Compare Nokia 6.1 vs Nokia 3.2
Nokia C3 related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 2.1 vs Nokia C3
- Compare Nokia 5.1 vs Nokia C3
- Compare Nokia 2.4 vs Nokia C3
- Compare Nokia 5.4 vs Nokia C3
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Nokia C3