Compare Nokia X50 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
| Name | Nokia X50 | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 524886 | 78446 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 6.26 " |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Five cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | g | 181 g |
| Dimensions | mm | 159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Nokia models here
Alternatives to the Nokia X50: Nokia 4.2 3/32Gb - Compare Nokia 1.3 - Compare Nokia 7.2 6/128GB - Compare |
129.18€ ($140.71) See Details |
Nokia X50 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Nokia X50’s camera vs Nokia 3.2’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung HM2 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Nokia X50 | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Nokia X50 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia X50 vs Nokia 3.2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Nokia X50 | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Nokia X50 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Nokia X50 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 524886 score points which is 569.10% faster than the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB, which got 78446. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Nokia X50 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Nokia X50 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 871 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB which got 167, it is 421.56% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2212 vs 546 (305.13% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Nokia X50 and Nokia 3.2 2/16GB? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia X50 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 569.10% faster in the Antutu test (446440 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung HM2 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3200x1440 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 2000mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Nokia X50 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (advantages)
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Nokia X50 related comparisons
- Compare Nokia X50 vs Nokia 8.3
- Compare Nokia X50 vs Nokia 7
- Compare Nokia X50 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Nokia X50 vs Nokia G50
- Compare Nokia X50 vs Samsung Galaxy M31
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 7 Plus vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia G21 vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C1
- Compare Nokia 6.1 vs Nokia 3.2