0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Samsung Galaxy M02

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Samsung Galaxy M02 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb with Samsung Galaxy M02.

Name Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Samsung Galaxy M02
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Samsung Galaxy M02
Antutu benchmark 38695 37699
CPU MediaTek MT6753 MediaTek MT6739
Diagonal size 5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1280x720 1600x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5 10
RAM 3 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 16 GB 32 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera 8 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Single camera Dual Camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 2 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 5020 mAh 5000 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes No
Operating system (OS) Android 7.0 Android 11
Material Metal Plastic
Weight 149 g 206 g
Dimensions 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm 164 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm
  Price Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb:
Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy M02:
Samsung Galaxy A80 - Compare
Samsung Galaxy M21 - Compare
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G - Compare

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Samsung Galaxy M02: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor E’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy M02’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Samsung Galaxy M02
Rear camera 8 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 2 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Samsung Galaxy M02: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor E vs Samsung Galaxy M02, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Samsung Galaxy M02
Battery 5020 mAh 5000 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours 10-12 hours
Talk time 30 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Samsung Galaxy M02: Antutu benchmark comparison. Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Samsung Galaxy M02: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 38695 score points which is 2.64% faster than the Samsung Galaxy M02, which got 37699. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Samsung Galaxy M02: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy M02 which got 108, it is 7.41% faster. In "Multi-core" score 603 vs 341 (76.83% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

What is the difference between Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb and Samsung Galaxy M02? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 2.64% faster in the Antutu test (996 score difference).
  • Best weight: 57 grams less (149 vs 206).
  • More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 20mAh).

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M02 (advantages)

  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 2Mp .
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 1280x720.

Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M02 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons

Samsung Galaxy M02 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.63/5 of 296
Frequent comparisons