Compare Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Samsung Galaxy M02
Name | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb | Samsung Galaxy M02 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 38695 | 37699 |
CPU | MediaTek MT6753 | MediaTek MT6739 |
Diagonal size | 5 " | 6.5 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 1600x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 10 |
RAM | 3 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 32 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 2 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 5020 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 7.0 | Android 11 |
Material | Metal | Plastic |
Weight | 149 g | 206 g |
Dimensions | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm | 164 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy M02: Samsung Galaxy A80 - Compare Samsung Galaxy M21 - Compare Samsung Galaxy M52 5G - Compare |
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Samsung Galaxy M02: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor E’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy M02’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb | Samsung Galaxy M02 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 2 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Samsung Galaxy M02: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor E vs Samsung Galaxy M02, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb | Samsung Galaxy M02 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 5020 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No |
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Samsung Galaxy M02: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 38695 score points which is 2.64% faster than the Samsung Galaxy M02, which got 37699. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Samsung Galaxy M02: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy M02 which got 108, it is 7.41% faster. In "Multi-core" score 603 vs 341 (76.83% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb and Samsung Galaxy M02? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 2.64% faster in the Antutu test (996 score difference).
- Best weight: 57 grams less (149 vs 206).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 20mAh).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M02 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 2Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M02 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus
Samsung Galaxy M02 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A10s vs Samsung Galaxy M02
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A01 vs Samsung Galaxy M02
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A10 vs Samsung Galaxy M02
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A01 Core vs Samsung Galaxy M02
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A11 vs Samsung Galaxy M02