Compare Cubot C30 8/256Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
| Name | Cubot C30 8/256Gb | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 149166 | 37524 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P60 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.4 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2310x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Metal and plastic |
| Weight | 190 g | 140 g |
| Dimensions | 157.05 x 76.44 x 8.5 mm | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot C30 8/256Gb: Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro - Compare Cubot Note 30 - Compare Cubot P40 - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Cubot C30 8/256Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot C30’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Samsung GM1 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Cubot C30 8/256Gb | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Cubot C30 8/256Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot C30 vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Cubot C30 8/256Gb | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Cubot C30 8/256Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot C30 8/256Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 149166 score points which is 297.52% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot C30 8/256Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot C30 8/256Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 307 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 164.66% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1242 vs 604 (105.63% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot C30 8/256Gb and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot C30 8/256Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 297.52% faster in the Antutu test (111642 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM1 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2310x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 4200mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 1400mAh).
Why it is better not to take Cubot C30 8/256Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 50 grams less (140 vs 190).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
Cubot C30 8/256Gb related comparisons
- Compare Cubot X30 vs Cubot C30
- Compare Cubot X50 vs Cubot C30
- Compare Cubot C30 vs Cubot C20
- Compare Cubot C30 vs Cubot King Kong 5 Pro
- Compare Cubot C30 vs Infinix Zero 8
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro