0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Nokia C2

Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Nokia C2 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Nokia 3.2 2/16GB with Nokia C2.

Name Nokia 3.2 2/16GB Nokia C2
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB Nokia C2
Antutu benchmark 78446 28377
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 UNISOC SC9832E
Diagonal size 6.26 " 5.7 "
Resolution 1520x720 1520x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5 5
RAM 2 Gb 1 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 16 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 5 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 4000 mAh 2800 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes No
Operating system (OS) Android 9.0 Android 9.0
Material Plastic Plastic
Weight 181 g 161 g
Dimensions 159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm 154.8 x 75.6 x 8.9 mm
  Price 129.03€ ($140.09) See Details Discontinued. View all Nokia models here
Alternatives to the Nokia C2:
Nokia 3.4 - Compare
Nokia 1 Plus - Compare
Nokia 2.1 - Compare

Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Nokia C2: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Nokia 3.2’s camera vs Nokia C2’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Nokia 3.2 2/16GB Nokia C2
Rear camera 13 Mp 5 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Nokia C2: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Nokia 3.2 2/16GB Nokia C2
Battery 4000 mAh 2800 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode 8-9 hours 5-6 hours
Talk time 25 hours 25 hours
Fast charging No No
Wireless charging No No

Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Nokia C2: Antutu benchmark comparison. Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Nokia C2: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Nokia 3.2 2/16GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 78446 score points which is 176.44% faster than the Nokia C2, which got 28377. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
6.26 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 429 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh
129.03€
$140.09
 
Nokia C2
5.7 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / SC9832E / 1Gb / 16GB / 5Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Nokia C2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Nokia 3.2 2/16GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 167 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia C2 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 546 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
6.26 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 429 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh
129.03€
$140.09
 
Nokia C2
5.7 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / SC9832E / 1Gb / 16GB / 5Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Nokia 3.2 2/16GB and Nokia C2? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 176.44% faster in the Antutu test (50069 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 5Mp
  • More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 1200mAh).

Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia C2 (advantages)

  • Best weight: 20 grams less (161 vs 181).

Why it is better not to take Nokia C2 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Nokia 3.2 2/16GB related comparisons

Nokia C2 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 2
Frequent comparisons