Compare Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Nokia C2
Name | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB | Nokia C2 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 78446 | 28377 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 | UNISOC SC9832E |
Diagonal size | 6.26 " | 5.7 " |
Resolution | 1520x720 | 1520x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 2 Gb | 1 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 5 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 4000 mAh | 2800 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |
Weight | 181 g | 161 g |
Dimensions | 159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm | 154.8 x 75.6 x 8.9 mm |
Price | 129.03€ ($140.09) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Nokia models here
Alternatives to the Nokia C2: Nokia 3.4 - Compare Nokia 1 Plus - Compare Nokia 2.1 - Compare |
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Nokia C2: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Nokia 3.2’s camera vs Nokia C2’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB | Nokia C2 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 5 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Nokia C2: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB | Nokia C2 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4000 mAh | 2800 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 1,5-2 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | No | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Nokia C2: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 78446 score points which is 176.44% faster than the Nokia C2, which got 28377. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Nokia C2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 167 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia C2 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 546 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Nokia 3.2 2/16GB and Nokia C2? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 176.44% faster in the Antutu test (50069 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 5Mp
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 1200mAh).
Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia C2 (advantages)
- Best weight: 20 grams less (161 vs 181).
Why it is better not to take Nokia C2 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 7 Plus vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia G21 vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C1
- Compare Nokia 6.1 vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia X6 vs Nokia 3.2
Nokia C2 related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 5.4 vs Nokia C2
- Compare Nokia 2.2 vs Nokia C2
- Compare Nokia 2.4 vs Nokia C2
- Compare Nokia 8.3 vs Nokia C2
- Compare Nokia 1 Plus vs Nokia C2