0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Nokia C30 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB

Nokia C30 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Nokia C30 with Nokia 3.2 2/16GB.

Name Nokia C30 Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
Nokia C30 Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
Antutu benchmark 102177 78446
CPU UNISOC SC9863 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
Diagonal size 6.82 " 6.26 "
Resolution 1600x720 1520x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5 5
RAM 2 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 32 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Dual Camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 6000 mAh 4000 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 11 Android 9.0
Material Plastic Plastic
Weight 237 g 181 g
Dimensions 177.7 x 79.1 x 9.9 mm 159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm
  Price Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Nokia models here
Alternatives to the Nokia C30:
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb - Compare
Nokia 7.2 4/64GB - Compare
Nokia 4.2 3/32Gb - Compare
128.23€ ($139.36) See Details

Nokia C30 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Nokia C30’s camera vs Nokia 3.2’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Nokia C30 Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Nokia C30 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia C30 vs Nokia 3.2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Nokia C30 Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
Battery 6000 mAh 4000 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours 8-9 hours
Talk time 30 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging No No

Nokia C30 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Antutu benchmark comparison. Nokia C30 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Nokia C30 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 102177 score points which is 30.25% faster than the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB, which got 78446. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Nokia C30
6.82 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / SC9863 / 2Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 6000mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
6.26 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 429 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh
128.23€
$139.36
 

Nokia C30 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Nokia C30 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 137 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB which got 167, it is -17.96% faster. In "Multi-core" score 630 vs 546 (15.38% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Nokia C30
6.82 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / SC9863 / 2Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 6000mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
6.26 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 429 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh
128.23€
$139.36
 

What is the difference between Nokia C30 and Nokia 3.2 2/16GB? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia C30 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 30.25% faster in the Antutu test (23731 score difference).
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 1520x720.
  • More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 2000mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Nokia C30 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (advantages)

  • Best weight: 56 grams less (181 vs 237).

Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (disadvantages)

  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Nokia C30 related comparisons

Nokia 3.2 2/16GB related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 10
Frequent comparisons