0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro

Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Vivo IQOO 3 with OUKITEL C16 Pro.

Name Vivo IQOO 3 OUKITEL C16 Pro
Vivo IQOO 3 OUKITEL C16 Pro
Antutu benchmark 588883 52117
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 MediaTek Helio A22
Diagonal size 6.44 " 5.71 "
Resolution 2400x1080 1520x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 8 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 128 GB 32 GB
External memory No MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 48 Mp 8 Mp
Camera Four cameras Dual Camera
Sensor model Sony IMX582
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 13 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 4440 mAh 2600 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 10.0 (Q) Android 9.0
Material Metal frame and glass case Plastic
Weight 214 g 153 g
Dimensions 158.5 x 74.9 x 9.2 mm 146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm
  Price Discontinued. View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo IQOO 3:
Vivo IQOO Neo6 SE 12/256GB - Compare
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G 8/256GB - Compare
Vivo IQOO 10 Pro 8/256GB - Compare
62.53€ ($68.11) See Details

Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO 3’s camera vs OUKITEL C16 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Vivo IQOO 3 OUKITEL C16 Pro
Rear camera 48 Mp 8 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX582
Flash Dual LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 13 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Vivo IQOO 3 OUKITEL C16 Pro
Battery 4440 mAh 2600 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours 5-6 hours
Talk time 30 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging No No

Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison. Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Vivo IQOO 3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 588883 score points which is 1029.92% faster than the OUKITEL C16 Pro, which got 52117. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Vivo IQOO 3
6.44 inches (2400x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 865 / 8Gb / 128GB / 48Mp Sony IMX582 / 4440mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
OUKITEL C16 Pro
5.71 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio A22 / 3Gb / 32GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh
62.53€
$68.11
 

Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Vivo IQOO 3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 924 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C16 Pro which got 161, it is 473.91% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3449 vs 538 (541.08% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Vivo IQOO 3
6.44 inches (2400x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 865 / 8Gb / 128GB / 48Mp Sony IMX582 / 4440mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
OUKITEL C16 Pro
5.71 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio A22 / 3Gb / 32GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh
62.53€
$68.11
 

What is the difference between Vivo IQOO 3 and OUKITEL C16 Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO 3 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 1029.92% faster in the Antutu test (536766 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX582 compared to 8Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 5Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1520x720.
  • More battery capacity: 4440mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 1840mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO 3 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 Pro (advantages)

  • Best weight: 61 grams less (153 vs 214).

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 Pro (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.
  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Vivo IQOO 3 related comparisons

OUKITEL C16 Pro related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.64/5 of 14
Frequent comparisons