Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone Power 3L
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Ulefone Power 3L |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 34933 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek MT6739 |
| Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 6 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 1440x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 6350 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Metal | Plastic |
| Weight | 139 g | 210 g |
| Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 159.3 x 75.8 x 10.7 mm |
| Price | 343.36€ ($374.00) See Details | 190.92€ ($207.96) See Details |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone Power 3L: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs Ulefone Power 3L’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Ulefone Power 3L |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone Power 3L: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone Power 3L, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | Ulefone Power 3L |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 6350 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone Power 3L: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 691.37% faster than the Ulefone Power 3L, which got 34933. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Ulefone Power 3L: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Power 3L which got 150, it is 234.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 370 (436.76% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and Ulefone Power 3L? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 691.37% faster in the Antutu test (241515 score difference).
- Best weight: 71 grams less (139 vs 210).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 1440x720.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Power 3L (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 6350mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 3850mAh).
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Power 3L (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Ulefone Power 3L related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL K6 vs Ulefone Power 3L
- Compare Vernee T3 Pro vs Ulefone Power 3L
- Compare Ulefone Power 3 vs Ulefone Power 3L
- Compare Ulefone Power 3L vs GOME U7
- Compare Blackview P2 vs Ulefone Power 3L