Compare Vivo IQOO U1 5G vs AGM A10 SE
| Name | Vivo IQOO U1 5G | AGM A10 SE | 
|---|---|---|
                          
                         | 
                
                    
                          
                         | 
                
            |
| Antutu benchmark | 307335 | 85177 | 
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 800U | UNISOC Tiger T310 | 
| Diagonal size | 6.53 " | 5.7 " | 
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1440x720 | 
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 | 
| RAM | 6 Gb | 2 Gb | 
| Bezel-less | No | No | 
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB | 
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | 
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp | 
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera | 
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp | 
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4400 mAh | 
| Wireless charging | No | No | 
| Network | 5 G | 4 G | 
| WiFi | Yes | Yes | 
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes | 
| NFC | No | Yes | 
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | 
| Notifications Led | No | Yes | 
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes | 
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) | 
| Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber | 
| Weight | 190 g | 230 g | 
| Dimensions | 162.1 × 76.6 × 8.5 mm | 168 x 78 x 11.4 mm | 
| Price | 
    
    
    Notify me when it goes on sale.
    View all Vivo models here
     Alternatives to the Vivo IQOO U1 5G: Vivo IQOO Neo6 12/256GB - Compare Vivo IQOO 10 12/256GB - Compare Vivo IQOO 12 - Compare  | 
                
            
                
                    
    
    
    Notify me when it goes on sale.
    View all AGM models here
     Alternatives to the AGM A10 SE: AGM A10 3/32Gb - Compare AGM Glory G1 Pro - Compare AGM M7 - Compare  | 
                
            
        
Vivo IQOO U1 5G vs AGM A10 SE: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO U1 5G’s camera vs AGM A10 SE’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo IQOO U1 5G | AGM A10 SE | 
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp | 
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | LED flash | 
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp | 
| Flash | No | No | 
Vivo IQOO U1 5G vs AGM A10 SE: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO U1 5G vs AGM A10 SE, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo IQOO U1 5G | AGM A10 SE | 
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4400 mAh | 
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable | 
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days | 
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days | 
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 8-9 hours | 
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours | 
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes | 
| Wireless charging | No | No | 
                        
 
                        Vivo IQOO U1 5G vs AGM A10 SE: Antutu benchmark comparison.
                    
                Vivo IQOO U1 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 307335 score points which is 260.82% faster than the AGM A10 SE, which got 85177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO U1 5G vs AGM A10 SE: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO U1 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 573 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM A10 SE which got 389, it is 47.30% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1674 vs 875 (91.31% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO U1 5G and AGM A10 SE? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO U1 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 260.82% faster in the Antutu test (222158 score difference).
 - Best weight: 40 grams less (190 vs 230).
 - Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp compared to 13Mp
 - Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1440x720.
 - More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 4400mAh (a difference of 100mAh).
 - Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
 
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO U1 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
 - Does not have water resistant supports.
 
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM A10 SE (advantages)
- NFC supports.
 - Have water resistant supports.
 
Why it is better not to take AGM A10 SE (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
 
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
 
Vivo IQOO U1 5G related comparisons
- Compare Vivo IQOO U1 5G vs Vivo iQOO U3
 - Compare Vivo X60 vs Vivo IQOO U1 5G
 - Compare Vivo iQOO Z1 vs Vivo IQOO U1 5G
 - Compare Vivo IQOO 7 vs Vivo IQOO U1 5G
 - Compare Vivo IQOO U1 5G vs Vivo S5
 
AGM A10 SE related comparisons
- Compare Ulefone Armor 2S vs AGM A10 SE
 - Compare Blackview BV5500 vs AGM A10 SE
 - Compare Doogee S40 vs AGM A10 SE
 - Compare AGM X3 vs AGM A10 SE
 - Compare AGM A9 vs AGM A10 SE