Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs AGM A2
Name | Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global | AGM A2 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 641773 | 18121 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 |
Diagonal size | 6.59 " | 4 " |
Resolution | 2340x1080 | 800x480 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 2 |
RAM | 16 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 512 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 2 Mp |
Battery | 6000 mAh | 2600 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 5 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 5.1 |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal and rubber |
Weight | 240 g | 129 g |
Dimensions | 171 x 78 x 9.8 mm | 133 x 73,2 x 14,7 mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Asus models here
Alternatives to the Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global: Asus ROG Phone 5s 12/128Gb - Compare Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 - Compare Asus ROG Phone 2 - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all AGM models here
Alternatives to the AGM A2: AGM G2 - Compare AGM A9 4/64Gb - Compare AGM M7 - Compare |
Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs AGM A2: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global’s camera vs AGM A2’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global | AGM A2 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 2 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs AGM A2: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs AGM A2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global | AGM A2 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 6000 mAh | 2600 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 6-7 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | No |
Wireless charging | No |
Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs AGM A2: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 641773 score points which is 3441.60% faster than the AGM A2, which got 18121. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs AGM A2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 950 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM A2 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3583 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global and AGM A2? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 3441.60% faster in the Antutu test (623652 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 800x480.
- More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 3400mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM A2 (advantages)
- Best weight: 111 grams less (129 vs 240).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM A2 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global related comparisons
- Compare Asus ROG Phone 4 vs Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global
- Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs Xiaomi Poco F3
- Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs Asus ROG Phone 5
- Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
AGM A2 related comparisons
- Compare AGM A2 vs Geotel G1
- Compare AGM A2 vs Nomu M6
- Compare AGM A2 vs EL S30
- Compare AGM A2 vs AGM A7
- Compare Nomu S10 vs AGM A2