Compare OUKITEL Y4800 vs AGM A8 3/32Gb
| Name | OUKITEL Y4800 | AGM A8 3/32Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 149833 | 22156 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P70 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 |
| Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4050 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 170 g | 247 g |
| Dimensions | 157 x 74.8 x 8.25 mm | 159 x 83 x 16 mm |
| Price | 182.86€ ($211.20) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all AGM models here
Alternatives to the AGM A8 3/32Gb: AGM M7 - Compare AGM X3 8/64Gb - Compare AGM H MAX - Compare |
OUKITEL Y4800 vs AGM A8 3/32Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL Y4800’s camera vs AGM A8’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | OUKITEL Y4800 | AGM A8 3/32Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
OUKITEL Y4800 vs AGM A8 3/32Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL Y4800 vs AGM A8, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | OUKITEL Y4800 | AGM A8 3/32Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4050 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No |
OUKITEL Y4800 vs AGM A8 3/32Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL Y4800 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 149833 score points which is 576.26% faster than the AGM A8 3/32Gb, which got 22156. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
OUKITEL Y4800 vs AGM A8 3/32Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL Y4800 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 310 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM A8 3/32Gb which got 80, it is 287.50% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1399 vs 212 (559.91% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between OUKITEL Y4800 and AGM A8 3/32Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL Y4800 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 576.26% faster in the Antutu test (127677 score difference).
- Best weight: 77 grams less (170 vs 247).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX582 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1280x720.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL Y4800 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM A8 3/32Gb (advantages)
- NFC supports.
- More battery capacity: 4050mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 50mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM A8 3/32Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
OUKITEL Y4800 related comparisons
- Compare Elephone Soldier vs OUKITEL Y4800
- Compare OUKITEL Y4800 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Global
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs OUKITEL Y4800
- Compare OUKITEL U23 vs OUKITEL Y4800
- Compare OUKITEL Y4800 vs Doogee N20
AGM A8 3/32Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs AGM A8
- Compare AGM A8 vs Nomu S30 Mini
- Compare Nomu S10 vs AGM A8
- Compare AGM A8 vs Blackview BV6000
- Compare AGM A8 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X