Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs AGM A9 4/64Gb
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | AGM A9 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 326155 | 65331 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 5.99 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2160x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Sony IMX486 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 187 g | 251 g |
| Dimensions | 159,9 x 75,1 x 8,4 mm | 168 x 81,4 x 12,6 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 8/512GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 4/64GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 8/128GB - Compare |
105.36€ ($112.68) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G’s camera vs AGM A9’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 12Mp Sony IMX486 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | AGM A9 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Sony IMX486 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs AGM A9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | AGM A9 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 326155 score points which is 399.23% faster than the AGM A9 4/64Gb, which got 65331. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 613 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM A9 4/64Gb which got 146, it is 319.86% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1916 vs 146 (1212.33% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and AGM A9 4/64Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 399.23% faster in the Antutu test (260824 score difference).
- Best weight: 64 grams less (187 vs 251).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 12Mp Sony IMX486
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 16Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2160x1080.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM A9 4/64Gb (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 5400mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 400mAh).
Why it is better not to take AGM A9 4/64Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52s vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A71 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
AGM A9 4/64Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi MI6 Ceramic vs AGM A9
- Compare AGM X2 SE vs AGM A9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 3 vs AGM A9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6 vs AGM A9
- Compare AGM X3 vs AGM A9