Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs AGM A9 4/64Gb
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | AGM A9 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 267699 | 65331 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 5.99 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2160x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Sony IMX486 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 213 g | 251 g |
| Dimensions | 163,9 x 76,3 x 9,5 mm | 168 x 81,4 x 12,6 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy M51: Samsung Galaxy S21+ 8/128GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 12/256GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 8/512GB - Compare |
108.16€ ($112.68) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy M51’s camera vs AGM A9’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 12Mp Sony IMX486 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | AGM A9 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Sony IMX486 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy M51 vs AGM A9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | AGM A9 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M51 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 267699 score points which is 309.76% faster than the AGM A9 4/64Gb, which got 65331. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M51 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 382 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM A9 4/64Gb which got 146, it is 161.64% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1518 vs 146 (939.73% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy M51 and AGM A9 4/64Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M51 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 309.76% faster in the Antutu test (202368 score difference).
- Best weight: 38 grams less (213 vs 251).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 12Mp Sony IMX486
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 16Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2160x1080.
- More battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5400mAh (a difference of 1600mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M51 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM A9 4/64Gb (advantages)
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM A9 4/64Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy M51 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy M31S
AGM A9 4/64Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi MI6 Ceramic vs AGM A9
- Compare AGM X2 SE vs AGM A9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 3 vs AGM A9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6 vs AGM A9
- Compare AGM X3 vs AGM A9