Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs AGM A9 4/64Gb
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | AGM A9 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 511288 | 65331 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 990 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 |
| Diagonal size | 6.9 " | 5.99 " |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 2160x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung Bright S5KHM1 | Sony IMX486 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 222 g | 251 g |
| Dimensions | 166,9 x 76 x 8,8 mm | 168 x 81,4 x 12,6 mm |
| Price | 597.20€ ($698.99) See Details | 96.27€ ($112.68) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra’s camera vs AGM A9’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung Bright S5KHM1 sensor and the 12Mp Sony IMX486 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | AGM A9 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung Bright S5KHM1 | Sony IMX486 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs AGM A9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | AGM A9 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 511288 score points which is 682.61% faster than the AGM A9 4/64Gb, which got 65331. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 490 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM A9 4/64Gb which got 146, it is 235.62% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2757 vs 146 (1788.36% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra and AGM A9 4/64Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 682.61% faster in the Antutu test (445957 score difference).
- Best weight: 29 grams less (222 vs 251).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung Bright S5KHM1 compared to 12Mp Sony IMX486
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3200x1440 vs 2160x1080.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM A9 4/64Gb (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 10Mp .
- More battery capacity: 5400mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 400mAh).
Why it is better not to take AGM A9 4/64Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
AGM A9 4/64Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi MI6 Ceramic vs AGM A9
- Compare AGM X2 SE vs AGM A9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 3 vs AGM A9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6 vs AGM A9
- Compare AGM X3 vs AGM A9