Compare Cubot King Kong Mini 2 vs AGM M5

Cubot King Kong Mini 2 vs AGM M5 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot King Kong Mini 2 with AGM M5.
Name	Cubot King Kong Mini 2	AGM M5

Antutu benchmark	55488	30188
CPU	MediaTek Helio A22	Qualcomm Snapdragon 210
Diagonal size	4 "	2.8 "
Resolution	1080x540	320x240
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	2
RAM	3 Gb	1 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	32 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	2 Mp
Camera	Dual Camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	Mp
Battery	3000 mAh	2500 mAh
Wireless charging	No	No
Network	4 G	2 G
WiFi	Yes	No
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes	No
Fingerprint's scanner	No	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)	Android 8.1
Material	Plastics and rubber	Plastics and rubber
Weight	g	173 g
Dimensions	mm	155 x 64 x 16.2 mm
Price	87.32€ ($94.45) See Details	79.06€ ($85.52) See Details

Cubot King Kong Mini 2 vs AGM M5: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong Mini 2’s camera vs AGM M5’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 2Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot King Kong Mini 2	AGM M5
Rear camera	13 Mp	2 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash	No
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	Mp
Flash	No

Cubot King Kong Mini 2 vs AGM M5: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong Mini 2 vs AGM M5, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot King Kong Mini 2	AGM M5
Battery	3000 mAh	2500 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	8-9 hours	7-8 hours
Talk time	30 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging	No	No

Cubot King Kong Mini 2 vs AGM M5: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong Mini 2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 55488 score points which is 83.81% faster than the AGM M5, which got 30188. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot King Kong Mini 2

4 inches (1080x540) Glass / Helio A22 / 3Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 3000mAh

87.32€

$94.45

55488

AGM M5

2.8 inches (320x240) Glass / Snapdragon 210 / 1Gb / 16GB / 2Mp / 2500mAh

79.06€

$85.52

30188

Cubot King Kong Mini 2 vs AGM M5: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong Mini 2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 159 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM M5 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 540 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot King Kong Mini 2

4 inches (1080x540) Glass / Helio A22 / 3Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 3000mAh

87.32€

$94.45

159 / 540

AGM M5

2.8 inches (320x240) Glass / Snapdragon 210 / 1Gb / 16GB / 2Mp / 2500mAh

79.06€

$85.52

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot King Kong Mini 2 and AGM M5? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong Mini 2 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 83.81% faster in the Antutu test (25300 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 2Mp
Has a higher screen resolution: 1080x540 vs 320x240.
More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 500mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong Mini 2 (disadvantages)

Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M5 (advantages)

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take AGM M5 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have water resistant supports.

Cubot King Kong Mini 2 related comparisons

AGM M5 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 200

Frequent comparisons