Compare LG K40 vs AGM M5
Name | LG K40 | AGM M5 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 75447 | 30188 |
CPU | MediaTek Helio P22 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 |
Diagonal size | 5.7 " | 2.8 " |
Resolution | 1440x720 | 320x240 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 2 |
RAM | 2 Gb | 1 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 32 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
Rear camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | Mp |
Battery | 3000 mAh | 2500 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 4 G | 2 G |
WiFi | Yes | No |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
Notifications Led | Yes | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 8.1 | Android 8.1 |
Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
Weight | 144 g | 173 g |
Dimensions | 153 x 71,9 x 8,3 mm | 155 x 64 x 16.2 mm |
Price | 97.37€ ($104.87) See Details | 79.40€ ($85.52) See Details |
LG K40 vs AGM M5: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the LG K40’s camera vs AGM M5’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 2Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | LG K40 | AGM M5 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | No |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | Mp |
Flash | LED flash |
LG K40 vs AGM M5: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the LG K40 vs AGM M5, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | LG K40 | AGM M5 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 3000 mAh | 2500 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 7-8 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
LG K40 vs AGM M5: Antutu benchmark comparison.
LG K40 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 75447 score points which is 149.92% faster than the AGM M5, which got 30188. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
LG K40 vs AGM M5: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
LG K40 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 163 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM M5 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 797 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between LG K40 and AGM M5? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the LG K40 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 149.92% faster in the Antutu test (45259 score difference).
- Best weight: 29 grams less (144 vs 173).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 2Mp
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1440x720 vs 320x240.
- More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 500mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take LG K40 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M5 (advantages)
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM M5 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
LG K40 related comparisons
- Compare LG K22 vs LG K40
- Compare LG K61 vs LG K40
- Compare LG K40 vs LG K50
- Compare LG K40 vs LG K8+
- Compare Doogee S55 Lite vs LG K40
AGM M5 related comparisons
- Compare Nomu M6 vs AGM M5
- Compare VKworld New V3 vs AGM M5
- Compare AGM M2 vs AGM M5
- Compare AGM M7 vs AGM M5
- Compare Vernee M7 vs AGM M5