Compare AGM M5 vs OUKITEL C16

AGM M5 vs OUKITEL C16 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of AGM M5 with OUKITEL C16.
Name	AGM M5	OUKITEL C16

Antutu benchmark	30188	24945
CPU	Qualcomm Snapdragon 210	MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size	2.8 "	5.71 "
Resolution	320x240	1520x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	2	5
RAM	1 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	2 Mp	8 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Dual Camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	Mp	5 Mp
Battery	2500 mAh	2600 mAh
Wireless charging	No	No
Network	2 G	3 G
WiFi	No	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)		GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 8.1	Android 9.0
Material	Plastics and rubber	Plastic
Weight	173 g	153 g
Dimensions	155 x 64 x 16.2 mm	146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm
Price	74.01€ ($85.52) See Details	Discontinued. View all OUKITEL models here Alternatives to the OUKITEL C16: OUKITEL WP8 Pro - Compare OUKITEL K3 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP200 Pro - Compare

AGM M5 vs OUKITEL C16: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the AGM M5’s camera vs OUKITEL C16’s camera, see the difference between the 2Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	AGM M5	OUKITEL C16
Rear camera	2 Mp	8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	No	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	Mp	5 Mp
Flash		No

AGM M5 vs OUKITEL C16: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AGM M5 vs OUKITEL C16, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	AGM M5	OUKITEL C16
Battery	2500 mAh	2600 mAh
Type	Removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	3-4 days	1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode	7-8 hours	5-6 hours
Talk time	25 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging	No	No

AGM M5 vs OUKITEL C16: Antutu benchmark comparison.

AGM M5 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 30188 score points which is 21.02% faster than the OUKITEL C16, which got 24945. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

AGM M5

2.8 inches (320x240) Glass / Snapdragon 210 / 1Gb / 16GB / 2Mp / 2500mAh

74.01€

$85.52

30188

OUKITEL C16

5.71 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh

0.00€

$0.00

24945

AGM M5 vs OUKITEL C16: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

AGM M5 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C16 which got 71, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 213 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

AGM M5

2.8 inches (320x240) Glass / Snapdragon 210 / 1Gb / 16GB / 2Mp / 2500mAh

74.01€

$85.52

0 / 0

OUKITEL C16

5.71 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh

0.00€

$0.00

71 / 213

What is the difference between AGM M5 and OUKITEL C16? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M5 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 21.02% faster in the Antutu test (5243 score difference).
Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take AGM M5 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 (advantages)

Best weight: 20 grams less (153 vs 173).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 8Mp compared to 2Mp
Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 320x240.
More battery capacity: 2600mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 100mAh).

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 (disadvantages)

Does not have water resistant supports.

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

AGM M5 related comparisons

OUKITEL C16 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.16/5 of 25

Frequent comparisons