Compare OUKITEL C16 Pro vs AGM M5

OUKITEL C16 Pro vs AGM M5 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of OUKITEL C16 Pro with AGM M5.
Name	OUKITEL C16 Pro	AGM M5

Antutu benchmark	52117	30188
CPU	MediaTek Helio A22	Qualcomm Snapdragon 210
Diagonal size	5.71 "	2.8 "
Resolution	1520x720	320x240
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	2
RAM	3 Gb	1 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	32 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	8 Mp	2 Mp
Camera	Dual Camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	Mp
Battery	2600 mAh	2500 mAh
Wireless charging	No	No
Network	4 G	2 G
WiFi	Yes	No
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 9.0	Android 8.1
Material	Plastic	Plastics and rubber
Weight	153 g	173 g
Dimensions	146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm	155 x 64 x 16.2 mm
Price	64.96€ ($67.75) See Details	81.99€ ($85.52) See Details

OUKITEL C16 Pro vs AGM M5: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL C16 Pro’s camera vs AGM M5’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 2Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	OUKITEL C16 Pro	AGM M5
Rear camera	8 Mp	2 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash	No
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	Mp
Flash	No

OUKITEL C16 Pro vs AGM M5: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL C16 Pro vs AGM M5, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	OUKITEL C16 Pro	AGM M5
Battery	2600 mAh	2500 mAh
Type	Removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	1,5-2 days	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	5-6 hours	7-8 hours
Talk time	25 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging	No	No

OUKITEL C16 Pro vs AGM M5: Antutu benchmark comparison.

OUKITEL C16 Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 52117 score points which is 72.64% faster than the AGM M5, which got 30188. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

OUKITEL C16 Pro

5.71 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio A22 / 3Gb / 32GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh

64.96€

$67.75

52117

AGM M5

2.8 inches (320x240) Glass / Snapdragon 210 / 1Gb / 16GB / 2Mp / 2500mAh

81.99€

$85.52

30188

OUKITEL C16 Pro vs AGM M5: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

OUKITEL C16 Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 161 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM M5 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 538 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

OUKITEL C16 Pro

5.71 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio A22 / 3Gb / 32GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh

64.96€

$67.75

161 / 538

AGM M5

2.8 inches (320x240) Glass / Snapdragon 210 / 1Gb / 16GB / 2Mp / 2500mAh

81.99€

$85.52

0 / 0

What is the difference between OUKITEL C16 Pro and AGM M5? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 Pro (advantages)

Good performance: Is 72.64% faster in the Antutu test (21929 score difference).
Best weight: 20 grams less (153 vs 173).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 8Mp compared to 2Mp
Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 320x240.
More battery capacity: 2600mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 100mAh).

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 Pro (disadvantages)

Does not have water resistant supports.

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M5 (advantages)

Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take AGM M5 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

OUKITEL C16 Pro related comparisons

AGM M5 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.04/5 of 24

Frequent comparisons