0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare AMIGOO R9 Max vs Cubot J5

AMIGOO R9 Max vs Cubot J5 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of AMIGOO R9 Max with Cubot J5.

Name AMIGOO R9 Max Cubot J5
AMIGOO R9 Max Cubot J5
Antutu benchmark 22000 21244
CPU MediaTek MT6580 MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size 6 " 5.5 "
Resolution 960x540 960x480
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5 2
RAM 1 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 8 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 2 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 2800 mAh 2800 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 3 G 3 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led No
Fingerprint's scanner No No
Operating system (OS) Android 5.1 Android 9.0
Material Plastic Plastic
Weight 212 g 157 g
Dimensions 169.5 x 84.5 x 8 mm 150.3 x 72 x 9.2 mm
  Price Discontinued. View all AMIGOO models here
Alternatives to the AMIGOO R9 Max:
66.13€ ($69.64) See Details

AMIGOO R9 Max vs Cubot J5: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the AMIGOO R9 Max’s camera vs Cubot J5’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name AMIGOO R9 Max Cubot J5
Rear camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 2 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

AMIGOO R9 Max vs Cubot J5: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AMIGOO R9 Max vs Cubot J5, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name AMIGOO R9 Max Cubot J5
Battery 2800 mAh 2800 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 4-5 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 1,5-2 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 5-6 hours 7-8 hours
Talk time 20 hours 25 hours
Fast charging No No
Wireless charging No

AMIGOO R9 Max vs Cubot J5: Antutu benchmark comparison. AMIGOO R9 Max vs Cubot J5: Antutu benchmark comparison.

AMIGOO R9 Max in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 22000 score points which is 3.56% faster than the Cubot J5, which got 21244. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

AMIGOO R9 Max
6" (960x540) / MT6580 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Cubot J5
5.5 inches (960x480) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 2800mAh
66.13€
$69.64
 

AMIGOO R9 Max vs Cubot J5: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

AMIGOO R9 Max in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot J5 which got 65, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 222 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

AMIGOO R9 Max
6" (960x540) / MT6580 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Cubot J5
5.5 inches (960x480) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 2800mAh
66.13€
$69.64
 

What is the difference between AMIGOO R9 Max and Cubot J5? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AMIGOO R9 Max (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 3.56% faster in the Antutu test (756 score difference).
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 960x540 vs 960x480.

Why it is better not to take AMIGOO R9 Max (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot J5 (advantages)

  • Best weight: 55 grams less (157 vs 212).
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 2Mp .

Why it is better not to take Cubot J5 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

AMIGOO R9 Max related comparisons

Cubot J5 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.44/5 of 27
Frequent comparisons