Compare Cubot King Kong vs Alcatel Flash Plus 2

Cubot King Kong vs Alcatel Flash Plus 2 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot King Kong with Alcatel Flash Plus 2.
Name	Cubot King Kong	Alcatel Flash Plus 2

Antutu benchmark	21244
CPU	MediaTek MT6580	MediaTek MT6755
Diagonal size	5 "	5.5 "
Resolution	1280x720	1920x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	2 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	8 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	8 Mp
Battery	4400 mAh	4000 mAh
Wireless charging
Network	3 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 7.0	Android 5.1
Material	Plastic
Weight	220 g	g
Dimensions	154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm	x x x x x x x x x x mm
Price	98.01€ ($106.44) See Details	Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Alcatel models here Alternatives to the Alcatel Flash Plus 2:

Cubot King Kong vs Alcatel Flash Plus 2: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong’s camera vs Alcatel Flash Plus 2’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot King Kong	Alcatel Flash Plus 2
Rear camera	8 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	8 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot King Kong vs Alcatel Flash Plus 2: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong vs Alcatel Flash Plus 2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot King Kong	Alcatel Flash Plus 2
Battery	4400 mAh	4000 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days
Battery Life	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging

Cubot King Kong vs Alcatel Flash Plus 2: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21244 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Alcatel Flash Plus 2, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot King Kong

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4400mAh

98.01€

$106.44

21244

Alcatel Flash Plus 2

5.5" (1920x1080) / MT6755 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh

On Sale Soon

Cubot King Kong vs Alcatel Flash Plus 2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 72 points score in "Single-core" of against the Alcatel Flash Plus 2 which got 83, it is -13.25% faster. In "Multi-core" score 258 vs 672 (-61.61% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot King Kong

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4400mAh

98.01€

$106.44

72 / 258

Alcatel Flash Plus 2

5.5" (1920x1080) / MT6755 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh

On Sale Soon

83 / 672

What is the difference between Cubot King Kong and Alcatel Flash Plus 2? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong (advantages)

More battery capacity: 4400mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 400mAh).
Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Alcatel Flash Plus 2 (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1280x720.

Why it is better not to take Alcatel Flash Plus 2 (disadvantages)

Does not have water resistant supports.

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot King Kong related comparisons

Alcatel Flash Plus 2 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.56/5 of 71

Frequent comparisons