Compare AGM M5 vs AllCall Madrid

AGM M5 vs AllCall Madrid Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of AGM M5 with AllCall Madrid.
Name	AGM M5	AllCall Madrid

Antutu benchmark	30188	21557
CPU	Qualcomm Snapdragon 210	MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size	2.8 "	5.5 "
Resolution	320x240	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	2	2
RAM	1 Gb	1 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	8 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera	2 Mp	8 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Dual Camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	Mp	2 Mp
Battery	2500 mAh	2600 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	2 G	3 G
WiFi	No	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)		GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	No	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 8.1	Android 7.0
Material	Plastics and rubber	Plastic
Weight	173 g	180 g
Dimensions	155 x 64 x 16.2 mm	154.70 x 76.20 x 8.8 mm
Price	74.05€ ($85.52) See Details	Discontinued. View all AllCall models here Alternatives to the AllCall Madrid:

AGM M5 vs AllCall Madrid: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the AGM M5’s camera vs AllCall Madrid’s camera, see the difference between the 2Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	AGM M5	AllCall Madrid
Rear camera	2 Mp	8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	No	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	Mp	2 Mp
Flash		No

AGM M5 vs AllCall Madrid: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AGM M5 vs AllCall Madrid, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	AGM M5	AllCall Madrid
Battery	2500 mAh	2600 mAh
Type	Removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	4-5 days
Battery Life	3-4 days	1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode	7-8 hours	6-7 hours
Talk time	25 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging	No

AGM M5 vs AllCall Madrid: Antutu benchmark comparison.

AGM M5 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 30188 score points which is 40.04% faster than the AllCall Madrid, which got 21557. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

AGM M5

2.8 inches (320x240) Glass / Snapdragon 210 / 1Gb / 16GB / 2Mp / 2500mAh

74.05€

$85.52

30188

AllCall Madrid

5.5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh

0.00€

$0.00

21557

AGM M5 vs AllCall Madrid: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

AGM M5 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the AllCall Madrid which got 66, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 229 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

AGM M5

2.8 inches (320x240) Glass / Snapdragon 210 / 1Gb / 16GB / 2Mp / 2500mAh

74.05€

$85.52

0 / 0

AllCall Madrid

5.5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh

0.00€

$0.00

66 / 229

What is the difference between AGM M5 and AllCall Madrid? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M5 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 40.04% faster in the Antutu test (8631 score difference).
Best weight: 7 grams less (173 vs 180).
Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take AGM M5 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AllCall Madrid (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 8Mp compared to 2Mp
Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 320x240.
More battery capacity: 2600mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 100mAh).

Why it is better not to take AllCall Madrid (disadvantages)

Does not have water resistant supports.

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

AGM M5 related comparisons

AllCall Madrid related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.16/5 of 25

Frequent comparisons