Compare Cubot J9 vs AllCall Madrid

Cubot J9 vs AllCall Madrid Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot J9 with AllCall Madrid.
Name	Cubot J9	AllCall Madrid

Antutu benchmark	23177	21557
CPU	MediaTek MT6580	MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size	6.21 "	5.5 "
Resolution	1520x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	2	2
RAM	2 Gb	1 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	No
ROM	16 GB	8 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera	8 Mp	8 Mp
Camera	Four cameras	Dual Camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	2 Mp
Battery	4000 mAh	2600 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	3 G	3 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	Yes	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)	Android 7.0
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	g	180 g
Dimensions	mm	154.70 x 76.20 x 8.8 mm
Price	Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot J9: Cubot X20 Pro - Compare Cubot King Kong 7 8/256GB - Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro - Compare	Discontinued. View all AllCall models here Alternatives to the AllCall Madrid:

Cubot J9 vs AllCall Madrid: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot J9’s camera vs AllCall Madrid’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot J9	AllCall Madrid
Rear camera	8 Mp	8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	2 Mp
Flash	No	No

Cubot J9 vs AllCall Madrid: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot J9 vs AllCall Madrid, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot J9	AllCall Madrid
Battery	4000 mAh	2600 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	4-5 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode	8-9 hours	6-7 hours
Talk time	30 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging	No

Cubot J9 vs AllCall Madrid: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot J9 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 23177 score points which is 7.51% faster than the AllCall Madrid, which got 21557. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot J9

6.21" (1520x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4000mAh

On Sale Soon

23177

AllCall Madrid

5.5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh

0.00€

$0.00

21557

Cubot J9 vs AllCall Madrid: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot J9 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 65 points score in "Single-core" of against the AllCall Madrid which got 66, it is -1.52% faster. In "Multi-core" score 222 vs 229 (-3.06% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot J9

6.21" (1520x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4000mAh

On Sale Soon

65 / 222

AllCall Madrid

5.5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh

0.00€

$0.00

66 / 229

What is the difference between Cubot J9 and AllCall Madrid? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot J9 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 7.51% faster in the Antutu test (1620 score difference).
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 2Mp .
Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 1280x720.
More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 1400mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot J9 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AllCall Madrid (advantages)

Why it is better not to take AllCall Madrid (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot J9 related comparisons

AllCall Madrid related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.00/5 of 22

Frequent comparisons